Link copied

Why I use both Cursor and Claude Code: a practical comparison

In this post, I share how I actually use Cursor and Claude Code in daily work.

Short version: I use both.

I originally started with Claude Pro, but I often felt I hit limits faster than expected.
That pushed me to rely more on Cursor.

At the same time, Claude Code still has clear strengths, so in practice I ended up with a hybrid workflow.

Why I use both

My default split looks like this:

  • Everyday coding, edits, and quick iteration in Cursor
  • Heavier investigation and customization-oriented tasks in Claude Code

Using only one tool feels limiting after a while.
A role-based split has been the most practical setup for me.

Pricing reality (for me)

Roughly speaking, higher tiers look like:

  • Claude Max: 100 USD
  • Cursor Pro+: 60 USD

Right now, I keep my monthly spend around 40 USD.

Sometimes it feels a bit tight.
But I also noticed a side benefit: tighter limits force me to write clearer prompts instead of throwing vague requests at the model.

So for now, that budget feels healthier overall.

Cursor: what I like

Why I keep using Cursor:

  • Cloud environment is available, and sandbox-style testing is straightforward
  • Prompting from mobile, web, or Slack is relatively easy
  • Composer 2 feels strong, and in my usage I do not hit limits too quickly
  • As an IDE, it is simply good enough to stay my daily driver

For day-to-day development experience, Cursor feels very comfortable.

Cursor: drawbacks

At this point, I do not have major complaints.

Sure, there can be minor preference issues, but nothing that consistently blocks my workflow.

Claude Code: what I like

Where Claude Code stands out for me:

  • Plugin ecosystem and customization are strong
  • I like the overall product design and feel
  • Mobile app connectivity is useful if you want a wider usage surface

If your workflow values flexibility and extensions, Claude still has a strong appeal.

Claude Code: drawbacks

The biggest downside is still cost.

Especially when using image-focused models for experimentation, token usage can ramp up faster than expected.

It is powerful, but easy to overspend without noticing.

Final take

For me, the key is not “which one is universally better,” but how to split responsibilities.

  • Daily coding comfort: Cursor
  • Extensibility and broader integration: Claude Code

Then manage it with a clear budget.

That balance has worked better than going all-in on only one tool.

New to Cursor? Try Cursor (50% off for a limited time) (referral link).

Related posts:

Reference (Amazon US): Claude · Cursor AI — books and related items